
Policy Process
Throughout the MPA program, I have studied how policies are shaped by political, legal, and institutional contexts, and I have applied this knowledge to explore how public problems are defined, debated, and addressed.
Through research projects and applied coursework, I have developed skills in policy analysis, drafting recommendations, and assessing the effectiveness of existing programs. I have also come to appreciate the importance of collaboration across sectors, as meaningful policy change often depends on partnerships between government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and community stakeholders.
This competency reflects my commitment to bringing informed, equitable, and transparent perspectives into the policy-making process, ensuring that decisions are responsive to both present needs and long-term societal goals.
The Intersection of Federalism and Public Administration
This paper examines how constitutional principles, court rulings such as Printz v. United States (1997), and programs like Medicaid shape public policy within the federal system. It highlights the role of administrators in interpreting and navigating the policy process, showing how intergovernmental dynamics influence policy design, implementation, and outcomes.
Working on this assignment helped me better understand how complex and interconnected the policy process truly is. I realized how much administrators must balance legal constraints, political pressures, and intergovernmental responsibilities when implementing public programs. Analyzing federalism in practice showed me that policy decisions are rarely linear; they require strong analytical skills and a deep awareness of how authority is shared across levels of government. This strengthened my appreciation for policy work and reinforced my commitment to developing the skills needed to contribute thoughtfully and effectively within this system.
Click the image to launch and explore the project.
The Role of Teachers' Unions in Public Education
This paper analyzes the role of teachers’ unions in shaping public education through collective bargaining, political influence, and advocacy. It traces the historical development of unionization, the protections unions secured for teachers, and their impact on working conditions, equity, and compensation.
Critics argue unions raise costs, protect poor performance, and limit administrative flexibility, while supporters highlight how unions advocate for fair treatment, additional classroom resources, and improved student learning conditions.
Studying the role of teachers’ unions expanded my understanding of how deeply labor organizations influence public education, not just in contract negotiations, but in shaping policy, equity, and day-to-day school operations. This assignment challenged me to think critically about the tension between protecting workers’ rights and ensuring flexibility and efficiency within schools. I found it particularly valuable to explore both sides of the debate: the argument that unions can create rigidity and higher costs, and the equally strong case that they safeguard fairness, advocate for resources, and help improve learning conditions.
Engaging with this topic helped me appreciate the complexity of policymaking in education, where multiple stakeholders often have competing but legitimate interests. It reinforced the importance of balanced, evidence-based analysis when evaluating politically charged issues and strengthened my commitment to approaching public sector challenges with fairness, nuance, and a focus on long-term community impact.
Click the image to launch and explore the project.
Policy Memo: Ensuring Fiscal Sustainability in State and Local Pension Systems
This policy memo addresses the pressing issue of unfunded state and local public pension liabilities, which exceed $1.37 trillion in the U.S. It outlines the causes of underfunding, including overly optimistic discount rate assumptions, political underfunding during budget cycles, demographic shifts, and volatile investment returns. The memo evaluates current approaches such as maintaining high discount rates, issuing pension obligation bonds, and adjusting COLAs, but concludes that these methods are insufficient or politically risky.
Writing this memo gave me a deeper appreciation for how complex and politically sensitive public pension policy really is. What initially seemed like a straightforward financial problem quickly revealed itself to be a balancing act between actuarial realities, political decision-making, and long-term commitments to public employees. Analyzing the causes of underfunding helped me understand how choices made decades earlier can create enormous fiscal pressures for future generations.
Evaluating current approaches also highlighted how difficult it can be for policymakers to implement reforms that are both financially responsible and politically feasible. I realized that even well-intentioned strategies, like pension obligation bonds or COLA adjustments, can create new risks if not designed carefully. This assignment strengthened my belief that sustainable public finance requires transparency, discipline, and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths. It also reinforced my commitment to developing policy solutions that promote intergenerational equity while preserving the retirement security that public employees rely on.
Click the image to launch and explore the project.


